‘Move 50% of flights from NAIA to Clark by ‘25’


Minority Leader Marcelino Libanan, in a statement, said the projected full recovery of global air travel from the Covid-19 pandemic is 2025.

“Assuming all flights are divided evenly between NAIA and Clark by 2025, only half of all flights would be cancelled, diverted or delayed in the event of a sudden emergency in either gateway,” Libanan said.

“For instance, if NAIA has another air traffic system glitch, or if a large aircraft suddenly has a runway excursion there, only 50 percent of all flights would be disrupted once the other 50 percent is already operating out of Clark,” Libanan said.

The lawmaker said Clark is capable of operating more flights, offers good connectivity to Metro Manila via modern expressways, and is only 90 kilometers away from Quezon City.

“We have no choice but to fully harness Clark, which has been up and running for years,” Libanan said.

Last week, civil aviation officials told the House transportation committee that NAIA’s air traffic system is now fully functional, but that the country’s busiest airport still has no back up in case the system breaks down again as it did on New Year’s Day.

“If we do not take full advantage of Clark as alternate gateway, there will be chaos at NAIA once global air travel explodes,” Libanan warned.

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) sees international traveler numbers reaching 82 percent of pre-pandemic level this year, 92 percent in 2024 and 101 percent in 2025.

Alternate gateway

Libanan said the government, through the state-run Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA), had invested P10 billion to fully develop Clark as an alternate gateway “precisely to alleviate congestion at NAIA and accommodate growing  passenger traffic.”

“In fact, on top of the BCDA’s investment, the Department of Transportation (DOTr) also spent billions of pesos to modernize Clark,” Libanan said.

Libanan said the DOTr’s plan to privatize NAIA “won’t solve the airport’s congestion.”

“NAIA’s problem is lack of land for expansion. No new parallel runway can be built there because the area around the airport is already highly urbanized,” Libanan said.

Long before the pandemic, Libanan said a study by the International Finance Corp. (IFC) had declared that: “Clark is the only immediate solution to address congestion in NAIA and expand airport capacity serving the Greater Capital Region (comprising Metro Manila, Southern Tagalog and Central Luzon).”

“NAIA is running over its design passenger and airside capacity, respectively. The current situation is unsustainable and can significantly undermine the Philippines’ competitiveness and economic growth,” according to the IFC study.

“Currently, flight delays and cancellations have become commonplace, as well as negative passenger experience. Having to fly through NAIA adds roughly four hours more to passenger travel time, having to pass through the highly congested roads of Metro Manila,” the study pointed out.

Outside of NAIA and Clark, Libanan said it would take 10 to 15 years to build another major aviation hub serving the Greater Capital Region – whether in Bulacan or Cavite.

Besides the New Year’s Day air traffic system malfunction that displaced 350 flights and 66,000 passengers, NAIA had also been paralyzed by runway excursions in the past.