Executives from Facebook Inc., Twitter Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s YouTube were pressed by US lawmakers last week on how user content is shared and highlighted on their platforms through algorithms that one senator said can be misused, “driving us into poisonous echo chambers.”
Senator Ben Sasse, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee’s panel on Privacy, Technology and the Law, made the comment as members examined algorithms—the lines of software code that determine how user-generated information is displayed and who gets to see it.
“Algorithms, like almost any technologies that are new, have costs and benefits” and can be abused, said Sasse, who is from Nebraska.
The hearing took place as the US Congress is considering how to overhaul Section 230, a provision of the 1996 communications law that protects Internet companies from liability for user content. One House proposal would make social-media platforms responsible for the way content is shared and amplified through algorithms.
“I plan to use this hearing as an opportunity to learn about how these companies’ algorithms work, what steps may have been taken to reduce algorithmic amplification that is harmful and what can be done better,” said Delaware Senator Chris Coons, a Democrat and the subcommittee’s chair, as he opened the hearing.
Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, the Democratic chair of the full Judiciary Committee, urged social-media companies to do more to remove harmful content, citing the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. He said domestic extremists organized and shared disinformation on some of the platforms represented at Tuesday’s hearing.
Monika Bickert, Facebook’s vice president for content policy, testified that its tools make the platform’s algorithm more transparent, so users can see why certain posts appear on their news feed.
“It is not in our interest financially or reputationally” to push people toward extremist content, Bickert said.
Lauren Culbertson, Twitter’s head of US public policy, highlighted the positive uses for algorithms and machine learning, especially the ability to recognize harmful content to review and remove. She said in her opening statement that Twitter is committed to studying the unintended consequences of algorithms and to giving users more choice over how algorithms shape their experience.
Alexandra Veitch, YouTube’s director of government affairs and public policy for the Americas and emerging markets, said the service uses an automated process to detect videos that violate the company’s policies, and algorithms can be used to promote trusted sources and minimize content that’s questionable. She described YouTube as “not just a hobby, but a business” for people who create and share videos on the platform.
‘Addicted, outraged’
But Tristan Harris, cofounder and president of the Center for Humane Technology, dismissed the testimony by the company executives, saying “it’s almost like having the heads of Exxon, BP and Shell asking about what are you doing to responsibly stop climate change.”
Harris, a former design ethicist at Google, said “their business model is to create a society that is addicted, outraged, polarized, performative and disinformed. That’s just the fundamentals of how it works.”
The role that algorithms play in sharing information—and disinformation—has taken on renewed importance as people turn to social media to learn and comment on issues such as Covid-19 vaccines, protests over police killings and election security. As Durbin indicated, the platforms have been under increased scrutiny since supporters of former President Donald Trump amplified disinformation ahead of the January 6 attack.
Trump was suspended by Facebook, Twitter and YouTube for comments that the companies said could lead to violence. Facebook’s Oversight Board is reviewing the decision, while YouTube has left open the possibility of reversing the suspension. Twitter said its ban of Trump’s account is permanent.
But Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the full Senate Judiciary Committee, voiced the frequent GOP complaint that social-media platforms censor conservatives. He described the companies as monopolies that don’t face the competition that would make them more responsible with user information. “We must look at the power and control that a handful of companies have over speech,” Grassley said.
Facebook has been advocating for updated Internet regulation, including new privacy rules. It has also called for election protection measures and an overhaul of section 230 to require more transparency, reporting requirements and best-practice guidelines for larger companies. As part of that campaign, Facebook is buying ads in the nation’s capitol pointing out how much the Internet has changed in the 25 years since current regulations became law.
Image courtesy of Bloomberg
Read full article on BusinessMirror